Anybody know how to configure OTM to provide more elegant and descriptive error messages in a Transmission Report other than a Java stack? I tried changing a few of the glog.integration properties, however, the IMessageText still consisted of a small description of the error and a large stack message. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Transmission Report Error Description
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: Transmission Report Error Description
I'm not aware of a way to remove the stack. I can suggest running an XSL to remove the stack information or parse it prior to distributing it. In the past I just had a process that controlled getting the message and then I distributed the error message to the appropriate group.
Hope that helps.
John
-
Re: Transmission Report Error Description
My mistake, I read it as you wanting to remove the stack, which personally bugs the heck out of me. Well if you don't mind the work you could take the integration message text that part of the Integration Guide and merge that text with the orginal ones you get as a response. This is a little more work, but is possible. I did this in a 4.5 implementaiton years ago. Mainly to segregate message for groups. I used a perl script to parse the XML message back and then resend an e-mail. Depends on the level of effort you want to go through.
Let me know if you a little more detail. Its been a while, but I do agree with you.
John
Comment
-
Re: Transmission Report Error Description
Hi,
We have a situation where a third party system sends a SAW and OTM procesess it and sends transmission report from OTM to process the next step in the process.When OTM sends the tranmission report it also sends the transmission Ack but they need only the report and not the Ack.Is there a way to suppress this Ack from going?
thanks,
OTM User
Comment
-
Re: Transmission Report Error Description
You can try setting the SuppressTransmissionAck to 'N' in the Transmission Body of the Transmission XML. This might only work if you are using OAQ, however.
<SuppressTransmissionAck>N</SuppressTransmissionAck>
Comment
Comment